(1) QCOM’s historical growth has been trending down for the last five years: from 17.4% Sales & 6.2% EPS since 2005, to 8.4% & -8.1% during the last three years, to -6.5% &-23.0% during its last reported year (2008), all with S&P data.

(2) In mid-January, Value Line reported that QCOM had reduced its 2010 Sales estimate and, as a result, VL lowered its 2010 estimate by nearly 6.0%, from $11.35B to $10.7B.

(3) When I did my SSG on 2-26-10, the seven analysts I always check were estimating long-term EPS at an average 15.61% with YahooFinance high at 19.86% and Value Line low at 6.00%.  VL looks like a low-ball outlier as the average of the other six was 17.21%.

– At Reuters.com, 15 analysts contributed to its 16.27% consensus estimate and ranged from a high of 30.00% to a low of 4.60%.  At CNNMoney, 13 analysts contributed to its 17.00% consensus and ranged from a high of 30.00% to a low of 13.00%. 

– QCOM’s historical growth seems too low to provide meaningful guidance for the future and the analysts seem too errratic as well as overly-optimistic.  Should I estimate EPS for the next five years at:

  •  around 4.60% (the lowest of the 15 analysts at Reuters); or
  •  06.00% (VL’s estimate); or
  •  13.00% (the lowest of the 13 analysts at CNNMoney); or
  •  14.00% (average without VL less 2 Standard Deviations); or        
  •  around 15.60% (average without VL less 1 SD). 

– I need to read QCOM’s latest annual and quarterly reports to learn the products that are likely to drive future growth which should help me decide whether to be conservative or optimistic.

I initially estimated 10.00% EPS in Armin-1 and 13.00% in Armin-2 with all other judgments the same.  My SSGs are set forth in the table that follows.  I also compared my SSGs to the analysis by Take Stock.

(4) Take Stock is a computerized, one-click program at the StockCentral website that is intended to produce a conservative result. 

** Take Stock’s analysis of QCOM looks nutsy to me.

(5) With S&P data, QCOM’s 5 year average Pre-Tax Profit Margin and Return on Equity are both trending down, but are both substantially better than their industry averages (PTPM: 39.30% QCOM vs 28.5% Communication Equipment Industry) (ROE: 19.50% QCOM vs 10.40% Industry). 

** QCOM’s PTPM and ROE may be trending down because they are unsustainably high rather than due to deteriorating fundamentals.

(6) To go to my Table of Contents: click here

Qualcomm             (QCOM) Armin-1 Armin-2 Take Stock at StockCentral.com
Date 2-26-10 Same 2-26-10
Data S&P Same Hemscott-Morningstar
Price $36.68 Same $36.68
52 week High &      Low Price $49.80 &           $32.64 Same N/A
Last Quarter of Reported Data Q1 ending           12-31-09 Same Same
Software Used TK 6 Same TS Online
Project Growth       From End of Last Q Same Last FY
 
Sales Growth 10.00% Same -06.20%
EPS Growth 10.00% 13.00% -16.20%
High PE 25.0 Same 30.0
High EPS $2.83 $3.24 $0.39
High Price $70.70 $81.00                 (8% > VL) $11.70                                   (78% < VL)

Value Line Estimated High Price = $55-75 as of 12-25-09 

Low PE 15.0 Same 18.8
Low EPS $1.76 (ttm) Same 0.91
Low Price $26.40                  (low PE x           low EPS) Same $17.11 (overriding              Low PE x Low EPS of $28.70)
Upside/Down 3.3 4.3 Impossible to Calculate
Total Return 15.3% 18.5% -18.6%
SSG Buy Under $37.19 $40.05 $6.33
RV/PRV 80.9/73.7            (2 outliers:       2005 &2006) Same/71.8 Not Used
RV/PRV 78.2/71.2             (no outliers) Same/69.3 Not Used
Quality S&P = B Same 0.50 (unacceptable)
 
PTPM – 5 yr ave 39.3%                 Trend down Same                 Same 33.3%                           Trend N/A
ROE – 5 yr ave      Beginning Equity 19.5%                   Trend down Same                 Same Not Used
ROE – 5 yr ave       Ending Equity 16.8%                   Trend down Same                 Same 19.1%                          Trend N/A
Debt to Equity –     5 yr ave 0.5%                    Trend even Same                 Same Not Used

 

Leave a comment