Walgreen (WAG), the retail drug store chain and mail-order pharmacy, has been recently SSGed by three NAIC gurus: Mark Robertson, the founder and general manager of ManifestInfesting.com, who conducted a workshop at StockCentral.com this month and used WAG as an example; Cy Lynch, who wrote an article about WAG in the January 2007 issue of Better Investing magazine; and Ann Cuneaz, a respected NAIC volunteer educator, who contributed her SSG to Mark’s recent workshop.

I thought it would be interesting to compare their SSGs along with my own, even though I’m no guru.

Mark R

Cy L

Ann C

Armin

SSG Date

12-1-06

10-24-06

11-16-06

10-31-06

Sales Gwth Est in 5 yrs

12.00%

12.00%

11.50%

13.00%

EPS Gwth Est in 5 yrs

12.40%

13.80%

11.20%

14.00%

Proj Hi PE

31.5

30.0

26.0

30.3

Est Hi Price

$97.30

$98.10

$75.10

$98.50

Proj Lo PE

21.5

22.0

16.0

20.9

Est Lo Price

$32.00

$35.00

$30.20

$35.30

Up-Down

6.9

6.1

2.6

6.5

Total Return

19.7%

18.0%

12.5%

18.1%

SSG Price

$40.27

$43.87

$42.72

$43.68

- I conclude that WAG is a SSG Buy using reasonably conservative judgments, while Ann may have been a little too conservative as her $75.10 Estimated High Price is less than the low end of Value Line’s $80-100 estimate. I never want to substantially exceed or substantially fall below VL’s Estimated High Price, at least not without a good reason. Ann is below, but not substantially below VL.

- When I did my SSG,the analysts were estimating long-term EPS as follows: First Call @ 15.20% (11 analysts); Zacks @ 15.36% (10); Reuters @ 15.19% (13); S&P via NAIC @15.50%; and VL @ 17.00% (with 100% Earnings Predictability). Ann’s 11.20% EPS estimate was the lowest of the four SSGs and 4.3% less than the lowest of the five analyst estimates (S&P @ 15.50%).

- WAG has declined $3.25 per share since 7-28 and this price difference made a hugh difference in my SSGs. I used the same judgments in both SSGs, but my prior analysis showed a 13.4% Total Return and a 2.9 Upside-Downside Ratio which meant that WAG did not then satisfy the SSG Buy criteria. What a difference $3.25 per share makes!!

-Armin

ps: This post took an unusual amount of work to publish. Because Blogger does not have a Tables feature (a hugh negative), I had to create the table in Word as I don’t know HTML; then Blogger refused to accept 5 or so codes or tags that Word inserted and I had to delete them one-by-one; then Blogger made me chose a new template solely in order to regain the font and color commands; and I could not repeat this tedious process when I tried again to prepare for my next table. Grrrrrrr!!