Comparing SSGs for Walgreen (WAG)
December 26, 2006
Walgreen (WAG), the retail drug store chain and mail-order pharmacy, has been recently SSGed by three NAIC gurus: Mark Robertson, the founder and general manager of ManifestInfesting.com, who conducted a workshop at StockCentral.com this month and used WAG as an example; Cy Lynch, who wrote an article about WAG in the January 2007 issue of Better Investing magazine; and Ann Cuneaz, a respected NAIC volunteer educator, who contributed her SSG to Mark’s recent workshop.
I thought it would be interesting to compare their SSGs along with my own, even though I’m no guru.
|
|
Mark R |
Cy L |
Ann C |
Armin |
|
SSG Date |
12-1-06 |
10-24-06 |
11-16-06 |
10-31-06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Gwth Est in 5 yrs |
12.00% |
12.00% |
11.50% |
13.00% |
|
EPS Gwth Est in 5 yrs |
12.40% |
13.80% |
11.20% |
14.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proj Hi PE |
31.5 |
30.0 |
26.0 |
30.3 |
|
Est Hi Price |
$97.30 |
$98.10 |
$75.10 |
$98.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proj Lo PE |
21.5 |
22.0 |
16.0 |
20.9 |
|
Est Lo Price |
$32.00 |
$35.00 |
$30.20 |
$35.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up-Down |
6.9 |
6.1 |
2.6 |
6.5 |
|
Total Return |
19.7% |
18.0% |
12.5% |
18.1% |
|
SSG Price |
$40.27 |
$43.87 |
$42.72 |
$43.68 |
- I conclude that WAG is a SSG Buy using reasonably conservative judgments, while Ann may have been a little too conservative as her $75.10 Estimated High Price is less than the low end of Value Line’s $80-100 estimate. I never want to substantially exceed or substantially fall below VL’s Estimated High Price, at least not without a good reason. Ann is below, but not substantially below VL.
- When I did my SSG,the analysts were estimating long-term EPS as follows: First Call @ 15.20% (11 analysts); Zacks @ 15.36% (10); Reuters @ 15.19% (13); S&P via NAIC @15.50%; and VL @ 17.00% (with 100% Earnings Predictability). Ann’s 11.20% EPS estimate was the lowest of the four SSGs and 4.3% less than the lowest of the five analyst estimates (S&P @ 15.50%).
- WAG has declined $3.25 per share since 7-28 and this price difference made a hugh difference in my SSGs. I used the same judgments in both SSGs, but my prior analysis showed a 13.4% Total Return and a 2.9 Upside-Downside Ratio which meant that WAG did not then satisfy the SSG Buy criteria. What a difference $3.25 per share makes!!
-Armin
ps: This post took an unusual amount of work to publish. Because Blogger does not have a Tables feature (a hugh negative), I had to create the table in Word as I don’t know HTML; then Blogger refused to accept 5 or so codes or tags that Word inserted and I had to delete them one-by-one; then Blogger made me chose a new template solely in order to regain the font and color commands; and I could not repeat this tedious process when I tried again to prepare for my next table. Grrrrrrr!!